WHU(Exeter)
2:13 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Charley, you keep that cryptic thing going, unlike my weekend bet NAP crap yours has been a great service.
|
WHU(Exeter)
2:03 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
KUMB had a brilliant thread about the history of the club crest, really interesting stuff even after 100 pages there was no complete agreement. only thread I've read on there.
WHO had crossed hammers badges that went on for 10,000 plus post
WHO 1 - 0 KUMB
|
Chi-townHammer
1:41 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
WHO = Weatherspoons
KUMB = well run Freehouse
|
stepney hammer
1:21 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
That said, WHO is fucking shit now compared to when I first joined in the early 2000's. Dying on its arse now.
|
stepney hammer
1:18 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
They all call some bloke 'boss' over there. They also tend to just meekly apologise if a mod pulls them up over something.
Bit to sanitised for my liking. Like comparing the bowl to the old ground.
|
Iron Duke
1:00 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
At least you didn’t say it would never of happened.
|
Iron Duke
12:59 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Is it wrong that the only thing I’m bothered about that last post is the missing full stop?
|
charleyfarley
12:50 Sun Sep 20
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
WHO has gone down in my opinion. Cryptic Crossword thread. Whatever next? A knitting thread? Would never have happened in the old days. Site needs to toughen up full of snowflakes
|
stewie griffin
8:54 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
If they have such a great knowledge of the clubs history, explain why they were willing to sell it down the river and played cheerleader for the move to the cesspit, banning anyone who dared to disagree and point out the blindingly obvious flaws in the design and the financials?
Horrible site. Shut down any meaningful discourse because they wanted to protect their standing with the owners, and now claiming to be on the side of the support. Too little, too late.
|
theaxeman
8:49 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
ChesterRd 6:17 Sat Sep 19
|
Texas Iron
7:04 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Kumb reminds me of Communist Russia...
Toe the party line...or get sent to Siberia...
WHO...Rebels...characters... free spirits welcomed...
I tried both ...exited KUMB sharpish...
It was mutual...
|
Side of Ham
7:03 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Kumb is that family pub where you have to behave in a certain manner and show a bit of respect even when getting intoxicated, WHO is the soft play area out the back...
|
Willtell
6:52 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Good post ChesterRd.
|
ChesterRd
6:17 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Loads of people post on both sites. My understanding is the usage traffic on KUMB vastly outranks WHO and other WH fan sites
For me the fundamental difference is that on KUMB I feel everyone is welcome and respected regardless of race or gender. You are West Ham, that is all that matters. On WHO there are an increasing number of threads and posts that demonstrate the exact opposite.
The football content is good on KUMB and I know a lot of fellow home and away STH post on it. A lot of people posting on there have a great knowledge of the club and it's history. It's also very anti GSB which suits me fine. I'm not saying there aren't such posters on WHO, there are, but more often than not they are drowned out by the dross.
KUMB is far moderated more than WHO but that wouldn't be difficult, this is a poorly moderated site and that has played a large part in its decline IMO.
One area that WHO excels in is the WHOers in need fund.
|
Peckham
12:39 Sat Sep 19
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Kumb is too all singing all dancing abit of everything.
WHO is simple, like half the posters, and me.
Simplicity is genius it is said.
Comedy, characters, harassment, death threats, cabbages videos, whofund make WHO better.
|
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
11:48 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
I'm sorry, but it has to be said. The correct term is addle-pated ninnyhammer.
That is all.
|
duffster
7:59 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Cheesebgt 1.46
|
Far Cough
7:57 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Arf, NINNY doesn't get used enough these days along with CAD and BOUNDER
|
Hammer and Pickle
7:56 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
He’d be asking me if he wanted a proper answer, the divvy old plonker.
|
easthammer
7:52 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
On KUMB they wouldn't have a thread
What are the fundamental differences between this site and WHO?
|
Nurse Ratched
7:45 Fri Sep 18
Re: What are the fundamental differences between this site and KUMB?
|
Cough
Bloke's a ninny.
|
| 
